Skip to contentSign in to unlock member prices — lower rates we can’t show publicly.

Notes · 15 September 2026 · industry

Wales cuts hospitality rates by 30% — and the hotels pay for it

The Welsh Bar, High Street, Merthyr Tydfil — photo by Jaggery, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons
TL;DR — Wales is cutting business rates for hospitality, accommodation and leisure by 30% from April 2027. Two things the headline hides: it replaces an existing 15% relief, so the change is a doubling rather than 30% off nothing; and it is funded from inside the same sector, with the largest properties — some of them hotels — paying about a penny in the pound more to cover it. The threshold is a rateable value under £51,000, which is a guest house, not a city-centre hotel. And unlike the English cut announced in July, this one covers rooms, not just pints.

The Welsh government announced on Sunday that pubs, hotels, gyms and cinemas will get a permanent 30% cut in business rates from April 2027. The First Minister, Rhun ap Iorwerth, framed it as delivering a promise to "rebalance the way business rates work". The Finance Minister, Elin Jones, put a number on who pays: roughly 1p in every £1 more from the largest properties.

I run a hotel booking site, so my interest is narrow and specific — what this does to the small places that actually list with people like me. Three things stood out, and only one of them is in the headline.

It is a doubling, not an arrival

The 30% figure is doing a lot of work. Hospitality in Wales already has a temporary 15% rate cut; the new measure replaces it. So a qualifying business is not going from full rates to 70% of them. It is going from 85% to 70%.

That is a real improvement, and permanence matters more than the number — a temporary relief that gets renewed annually is impossible to plan around, and this one is not temporary. But "30% cut" and "the relief you already had is now twice as big" are different sentences, and only the second one is true.

The publican quoted by the BBC put the honest scale on it: across two pubs, about £3,000 a year. Worth having. Not transformative.

The threshold decides who this is for

The cut applies to properties with a rateable value below £51,000. For accommodation, that is a meaningful line. A few letting rooms above a pub, a seaside guest house, a small independent inn — those are comfortably under it. A hotel of any real size is not.

This is the part I find genuinely well-aimed. The places most exposed to a bad shoulder season are the ones with fifteen rooms and no group behind them, and they are exactly the ones under £51,000. If you were designing a relief to reach independent accommodation rather than chains, this is roughly how you would set it.

The money comes from inside the sector

Here is the bit worth sitting with. The cut is not funded from general spending. It is funded by increasing rates on the highest-value properties in Wales — which, the government says, includes some hotels alongside supermarkets and other large sites. Ministers were explicit that this keeps local authority funding whole.

So this is a transfer, not an injection. Large hotels are part of how small hotels get their cut.

I do not think that is wrong. A 200-room property and a six-room guest house are not in the same business in any meaningful sense, and the smaller one has no pricing power, no central booking team and no ability to absorb a quiet February. If the money has to come from somewhere inside hospitality, that is a defensible place to take it from. But it should be described accurately. UK Hospitality Cymru welcomed the cut while warning about "massive amounts of taxation coming from all areas", and both halves of that sentence are doing honest work.

Wales covered rooms. England's cut did not.

In July, the UK government announced a 20% business rates cut in England for pubs, social clubs and live music venues, also from April 2027. Accommodation was not in that list — hotels and restaurants are explicitly outside it, and the trade press covered the announcement as hotels missing out. It reaches around 32,000 venues and saves a typical pub roughly £1,100 in its first year.

Wales has included accommodation and leisure. That is the divergence that matters if you run rooms rather than a bar, and it is the reason this is a hotel story rather than a pub story. From April 2027 a small guest house in Monmouth and one in Herefordshire — forty minutes apart — will be treated differently by the tax system, on the basis of which side of a line they sit.

I have no complaint about devolution producing different answers; that is what it is for. But anyone comparing the two announcements should notice that the headline percentages are not comparing the same thing, or the same businesses.

What I will actually watch

Rates are one input, and the publican in the article pointed straight at the bigger one: VAT, which is reserved to Westminster and which no devolved government can touch. A 30% cut on a rateable value under £51,000 does not move the needle the way a VAT change would.

So my expectation is modest. This will help some small Welsh accommodation businesses survive a thin winter, which is worth doing and is more than nothing. It will not change what a room costs, and I would be sceptical of anyone claiming it will show up in prices. If it shows up anywhere, it shows up as a few more independent places still trading in 2028 than would otherwise have been — and on a site like mine, that is visible as choice rather than as price.

April 2027 is a long way off. I will come back to it when the revaluation figures are real rather than announced.

Reported by the BBC, 14 September 2026: [Pubs, hotels and gyms in Wales to get 30% business rates cut](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6n9w87ejqn2o).

— Nick, Founder